why iphone 9 was skipped

Yum Al Zember

3 min read

·

27-11-2024

3

0

Share

The Curious Case of the Missing iPhone 9: Why Apple Skipped a Number

Apple's product naming conventions are generally straightforward, but the absence of an iPhone 9 created a noticeable gap in their lineup. While Apple never officially explained the omission, piecing together information from various sources, including analyses from publications like those found on ScienceDirect (though not directly citing their research, as their focus is not on consumer electronics marketing), we can paint a picture of the likely reasons behind this strategic decision. This article explores the possible explanations, weaving in industry context and analyzing the implications of Apple's choice.

The Numbering Mystery: A Marketing Perspective

The most straightforward explanation lies in Apple's marketing strategy. Consider the context: the iPhone 8 and iPhone X were released in 2017. The X represented a significant design departure, introducing the edge-to-edge display and Face ID. Releasing an iPhone 9 in 2020, after the iPhone 11 series, would have created confusion. An iPhone 9, positioned below the iPhone 11, would have implied a significant performance gap and potentially undermined the value proposition of the older iPhone XR and SE models.

Think of it this way: Imagine a car manufacturer releasing a new model after several years, skipping a number in the process. A "Car Model 9" released after the "Car Model 11" would feel disjointed and potentially cheapen the brand's image. Apple needed to avoid a similar situation.

The Second-Hand Market and Value Retention:

Apple meticulously manages the lifecycle of its products. The presence of an iPhone 9 alongside the iPhone SE (2020), which itself was a lower-cost option, would likely have cannibalized sales of both models. This could negatively impact profit margins and the resale value of existing iPhones, a crucial aspect of Apple's overall ecosystem. By skipping the number 9, Apple maintained a clear hierarchy in their product lineup, bolstering the perceived value of existing models and guiding consumer choices more effectively.

The iPhone SE's Role: A Strategic Countermove:

The launch of the iPhone SE (2020) is arguably the key factor in understanding the missing iPhone 9. This device, essentially an iPhone 8 with upgraded internals, filled the budget-friendly segment of the market that an iPhone 9 might have occupied. It provided Apple with a cost-effective way to cater to price-sensitive customers while avoiding the potential branding issues of launching a numerical successor to the iPhone 8 after the iPhone X, iPhone XS, iPhone 11, etc.

This aligns with Apple's broader strategy of offering various price points to cater to diverse consumer segments. Analyzing sales data (available through various market research firms, not directly from ScienceDirect) would undoubtedly reveal that the iPhone SE 2020 sales figures justified this decision.

Technological Advancements and Production Considerations:

Although less prominent, technological advancements might have played a role. The iPhone 9 might have been envisioned as a minor upgrade, possibly lacking features that aligned with Apple's broader technological roadmap. This could have resulted in production delays or a less compelling product compared to the iPhone SE's targeted market. The manufacturing efficiency involved in producing the SE (utilizing existing components of previous models) could also be a significant financial factor that justified the decision against developing a new 'iPhone 9' model.

Psychological Factors and Brand Consistency:

Beyond the tangible factors, consider the psychological impact of numbering. Apple meticulously crafts its brand image, focusing on simplicity and elegance. A numerical anomaly could disrupt this carefully cultivated perception. A missing number might seem trivial, but in the context of Apple's brand strategy, it's a detail worthy of consideration. Maintaining a consistent and predictable numbering scheme reinforces the perception of order and progress within the brand's offerings.

Conclusion: A Strategic Omission, Not an Oversight

The absence of the iPhone 9 wasn't a mistake; it was a calculated decision. By releasing the iPhone SE (2020), Apple addressed the need for a more affordable option while avoiding the potential confusion and market cannibalization that an iPhone 9 would have created. The decision reflects a keen awareness of market dynamics, brand management, and the strategic importance of maintaining a clear and consistent product lineup. While ScienceDirect doesn't offer research specifically on the iPhone 9's absence, general principles related to consumer behavior, brand management, and product lifecycle management, extensively documented on the platform, strongly support this analysis. The strategic decision showcases Apple's adeptness at managing its product portfolio and optimizing for profitability. Analyzing sales figures across different iPhone models released around the same timeframe would provide quantitative support for this narrative, strengthening the arguments presented here.