"which of the following terms identifies the type of land survey system

Airlie

4 min read

·

11-03-2025

5

0

Share

Decoding Land Survey Systems: Metes and Bounds, Rectangular Survey, and More

Land surveying, the science and art of determining the three-dimensional position of points and the distances and angles between them, forms the bedrock of property ownership and land management. Understanding the different survey systems used across the globe is crucial for anyone involved in real estate, construction, or land development. This article explores several prominent land survey systems, answering the key question: which system best fits a particular description? We'll delve into the nuances of each, clarifying their strengths and weaknesses, and providing real-world examples.

1. Metes and Bounds:

This system, prevalent in the eastern United States and parts of Canada, relies on detailed descriptions of property boundaries using metes (distances) and bounds (natural or artificial landmarks). A typical metes and bounds description might read: "Beginning at the oak tree on the north bank of the creek; thence North 100 feet to the iron pin; thence East 50 feet to the corner of the Jones property; thence South 100 feet to the creek; thence along the creek to the point of beginning."

• Strengths: Highly adaptable to irregular land shapes, following natural features effectively.

• Weaknesses: Descriptions can be complex, ambiguous, and prone to errors over time due to changes in natural landmarks (e.g., erosion, tree removal) or the loss of survey markers. Legal disputes can arise from poorly defined boundaries.

• Example: Imagine a coastal property with an irregular shoreline. A metes and bounds survey would accurately trace the property line along the high-water mark, incorporating natural features like rock formations or inlets into the description. This is significantly easier than attempting to fit it into a regular grid system.

2. Rectangular Survey System (Public Land Survey System - PLSS):

This system, also known as the PLSS, is the dominant method in much of the western United States. It employs a grid-based approach, dividing land into townships (6 miles square), sections (1 mile square, 640 acres), and further subdivisions. Townships are numbered relative to principal meridians (north-south lines) and base lines (east-west lines).

• Strengths: Simple, easily understood, and facilitates relatively straightforward land transfer and documentation. The grid structure lends itself well to large-scale land management and planning. This system is significantly easier to represent digitally and on maps than metes and bounds.

• Weaknesses: Doesn’t conform well to irregular terrain or existing property lines, leading to fractional sections and irregular shapes near boundaries. Errors in the initial survey can accumulate and cause discrepancies over large areas. The rigid grid ignores natural features, potentially leading to inefficient land use.

• Example: The state of Kansas is primarily surveyed using the PLSS. Finding a specific parcel involves simply determining its township, range, and section number. This simple numerical identifier makes property identification and location straightforward. This contrasts with the often lengthy and descriptive metes and bounds descriptions.

3. Longlot System:

This system, common in parts of Canada and other areas with river valleys, divides land into long, narrow parcels extending from a river or road. This allows each property owner access to the water source or transportation route.

• Strengths: Provides efficient access to a vital resource (water or transportation).

• Weaknesses: Inefficient use of land for certain purposes, especially those not directly dependent on the river or road. Can lead to difficulties in subdividing properties.

• Example: Imagine a settlement along a river. The Longlot system would assign properties as long, narrow strips extending from the river, ensuring all landowners have river frontage. This is highly efficient if river access is paramount but less so if the primary use of land is agriculture requiring large square parcels.

4. Other Systems:

While Metes and Bounds, the Rectangular Survey, and the Longlot system are the most common, other systems exist depending on the historical and geographic context. These may include:

• Colonial systems: Variations on the above, often reflecting the surveying practices of the colonizing power.
• Indigenous systems: Traditional land tenure systems based on customary law and practices, often involving complex relationships with the land, not easily mapped onto Western surveying models.
• Modern Geospatial Systems: Utilizing GPS and GIS technology for extremely accurate mapping and surveying, often integrated with existing systems.

Choosing the Right System:

The choice of land survey system depends on several factors, including the topography of the land, its intended use, the existing land tenure system, and the level of accuracy required. The rectangular system is ideal for large, relatively flat areas where efficient land allocation is important. Metes and bounds are better suited for irregular terrains and existing property lines, even if more complex. The Longlot system is optimized for access to a linear resource. Modern technologies are constantly enhancing and refining these traditional methods.

Addressing Ambiguity and Errors:

Regardless of the system used, the potential for ambiguity and errors remains. Professional surveyors play a critical role in accurately defining and documenting property boundaries. Legal descriptions should be clear, concise, and unambiguous. Regular resurveys, particularly in areas with dynamic environments or historical inaccuracies, are essential for maintaining accurate land records and preventing disputes. Technological advancements like GIS and GPS continue to improve the accuracy and efficiency of land surveying, offering solutions to the challenges posed by traditional methods.

Conclusion:

Understanding the various land survey systems is vital for navigating the complex world of land ownership and management. Each system has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice depends heavily on the specific context. By carefully considering the terrain, intended use of the land, and potential for ambiguities, professionals and landowners alike can ensure clear, accurate, and legally sound property descriptions and management. The ongoing integration of modern technologies offers continual improvement to the process, providing more precise and readily accessible data. This, in turn, leads to a more efficient and equitable approach to land management and administration.